Sig Sauer P365 Semi-Automatic Pistol 9mm Luger 3.1″ Barrel 10-Round Black

(9 customer reviews)

$499.00

SIG Sauer describes its Sig Sauer P365 as a micro-compact pistol for everyday carry. It is a polymer frame striker-driven design with a stainless steel slider assembly. The next thing that came to mind was how good my hands felt.

Buy Sig Sauer P365 Online

SIG Sauer describes its Sig Sauer P365 as a micro-compact pistol for everyday carry. That’s pretty much the sum of it all. It is a polymer frame striker-driven design with a stainless steel slider assembly. The polymer frame loses weight and is somewhat flexible when firing a pistol and thus causes the felt recoil to dampen somewhat.

Which is better, Glock 43 or SIG P365?

Although dimensionally similar in width, the Glock grip is large enough front to back, p365 sig Sauer it fits my hand a little better. The sig looks smaller, and the grip angle is slightly more perpendicular to the slide than the Glock 43 angle, between two barrel lengths. Sig Sauer P365X Pistol 9mm Luger 3.1″ Barrel X-RAY 3 Night Sights for online.

Is the SIG P365 a single stack gun?

For the past 6 years, gun owners have sig Sauer p365 9mm bought into the idea that a concealed handgun should be slim, lightweight, single stack, somewhere within 6-8 rounds of power, and fired from the firing pin. Private carriers have also bought into the idea that it must be a single stack for a weapon to meet these requirements. Enter SIG P365.

Specifications
Handedness Ambidextrous
Action Striker Fired
Metal finish Nitron
Grip Polymer
Product weight 17.8 ounces
Manual Safety No
Product length (in.) 5.8
Style Pistol
Magazine capacity 10+1
Barrel length (in.) 3.1
Caliber 9mm Luger
Rifle Ammo Type Centerfire

9 reviews for Sig Sauer P365 Semi-Automatic Pistol 9mm Luger 3.1″ Barrel 10-Round Black

5 Star
33.33%
3 review(s)
4 Star
66.67%
6 review(s)
3 Star
0%
0 review(s)
2 Star
0%
0 review(s)
1 Star
0%
0 review(s)

Reviewed by 01 customer(s)

Sort by

  • Avatar

    Stephen

    Great little snubbie! Never owned or shot one before. My experience is with 1911’s and AR platforms from my time in the service. I bought this for summer concealed carry…something I can just put in my pocket…something reliable…and a revolver is the most reliable platform.

    April 8, 2022
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Patrick

    I have had mine about 2 years. When I first got it, I notice that there were some issues with reliability, with the first 200-400 rounds. After that it has been a flawless rifle, and I’m well into the thousands of rounds through it. Somewhere between 4000-5000. I think the reliability issues came from the sharp angles on the hammer-face. Once I shot it more it smoothed it out a bit, and it stopped catching. I will be buying more from PSA. They made me love the AK design. I have used ak’s before but never owned one until this rifle. I admit I buy a lot of Gucci guns, so I’m really happy PSA has delivered a product that encourages me to give the cheaper brands a chance

    March 19, 2022
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Larry

    boy we old guys have to constantly answer stupid questions and challenges so ck out national interest.org july /2018 and think before you print…..

    July 4, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Larry

    own 2 ar’s and 5 ak’s.There is a reason and it’s not the price;if I want reliable is ak all the way why do you think seals use them.The 2 ar’s are 762 and because of design both break bolts after about 2000 rounds.I don’t need this when SHTF.Also have USA Draco and it purrs like wildcat .Just sayin…

    July 2, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Mike

    Reliable? Aks have failed and the mudtest showed that. Ballistics better than 5.56 in sbrs? Debatable. 77 grain 5.56 out of a 10.3 is still going faster than 7.62×39 out of this 12.25 barrel. Yeah it’s cool and a beast gun but there’s a reason even the russians moved away from 7.62×39 and into 5.45.

    May 21, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    RJack

    there’s a reason the 300blk out is gaining steam. and it’s not only because it suppresses well. it also has very similar ballistics to the 7.62 x39.

    (also the russians switched to 5.45 because weight, and recoil under full auto)

    April 23, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Nick

    “AK’s have failed”…that’s like saying “Shit has smelled good before.” Maybe. But rarely. Stoppages are a way of life for AR’s, an occasional thing for AK’s. Is the bullet going twice as fast? Let’s face it, I have some 154 grain soft nosed bullets. Probably travelling at least 4/5ths the speed of your 77 grainer. Twice the weight. Half again as large in diameter. Ain’t gonna throw mine in the mud. I have used both. Clean ’em, lube ’em, put ’em side by side and fire till they stop. See which one fails first. You know as well as I do the AK will still be running long after the AR freezes up. Heavier bullet, larger diameter, way more dependable. You know that.

    April 8, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Gruber

    the M16/AR15 was not the same weapon in 1967 as it is today. Everyone knows it had reliability issues, most of which was caused by ammunition/powder.

    January 20, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Hans

    SEALs *used* AKs in a war 50+ years ago, that’s not the same thing as “SEALs use them.” There’s a plethora of reasons they used them, not all were because of reliability. For example, if behind enemy lines, ammo can be resupplied off of enemy dead. Modern day SOF use a lot of different weapons, and train on everything they might encounter. It doesn’t mean the AK is their primary weapon, which is what you made it sound like.

    January 20, 2021
    Verified Review

Leave feedback about this

Your email address will not be published.

1
$979.00