Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop

S&W 500 PC 500S&W 10.5″ BARREL 5RD 170231

(16 customer reviews)

$620.00

S&W 500 PC

The S&W 500 PC or 12.7×41mmSR is a.50 caliber semi-rimmed revolver cartridge developed by Cor-Bon in partnership with the Smith & Wesson “X-Gun” engineering team for use in the Smith & Wesson Model 500 X-frame revolver and introduced in February 2003 at the SHOT Show.

As a lower-energy, a lower-recoiling alternative to the .500 S&W Magnum cartridge Cor-Bon introduced the .500 S&W Special in 2004. This cartridge fires a 350-grain (23 g) bullet at 1,250 feet per second (380 m/s) and is compatible with handguns chambered for the .500 S&W Magnum. 

So, the Smith & Wesson Model 500 revolver and the.500 S&W Magnum cartridges were introduced eleven months later, on January 9, 2003. According to Belin, the cartridge was developed from the start to be substantially more powerful than any prior production handgun cartridge. Buy S&W 69 L-FRAME 44 REM MAGNUM 4.25″ BARREL 5RD 162069 online.

On specific S&W Performance Center models, the compensator is replaced with a muzzle brake. Like most large caliber handguns, the Model 500 is suitable for sport and hunting applications. Any of the available bullet weights can be relied on to take the game at a range over 200 yards (183 m), a feat matched by only a handful of other handguns.

16 reviews for S&W 500 PC 500S&W 10.5″ BARREL 5RD 170231

5 Star
40%
6 review(s)
4 Star
60%
9 review(s)
3 Star
0%
0 review(s)
2 Star
0%
0 review(s)
1 Star
0%
0 review(s)

Reviewed by 02 customer(s)

Sort by

  • Avatar

    Hello World! https://helloworld.com?hs=22c35e277e98a4c5f8a781175d457a33&

    krnwrd

    September 13, 2022
  • Avatar

    Patrick

    I have had mine about 2 years. When I first got it, I notice that there were some issues with reliability, with the first 200-400 rounds. After that it has been a flawless rifle, and I’m well into the thousands of rounds through it. Somewhere between 4000-5000. I think the reliability issues came from the sharp angles on the hammer-face. Once I shot it more it smoothed it out a bit, and it stopped catching. I will be buying more from PSA. They made me love the AK design. I have used ak’s before but never owned one until this rifle. I admit I buy a lot of Gucci guns, so I’m really happy PSA has delivered a product that encourages me to give the cheaper brands a chance

    March 19, 2022
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Larry

    boy we old guys have to constantly answer stupid questions and challenges so ck out national interest.org july /2018 and think before you print…..

    July 4, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Larry

    own 2 ar’s and 5 ak’s.There is a reason and it’s not the price;if I want reliable is ak all the way why do you think seals use them.The 2 ar’s are 762 and because of design both break bolts after about 2000 rounds.I don’t need this when SHTF.Also have USA Draco and it purrs like wildcat .Just sayin…

    July 2, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Mike

    Reliable? Aks have failed and the mudtest showed that. Ballistics better than 5.56 in sbrs? Debatable. 77 grain 5.56 out of a 10.3 is still going faster than 7.62×39 out of this 12.25 barrel. Yeah it’s cool and a beast gun but there’s a reason even the russians moved away from 7.62×39 and into 5.45.

    May 21, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    RJack

    there’s a reason the 300blk out is gaining steam. and it’s not only because it suppresses well. it also has very similar ballistics to the 7.62 x39.

    (also the russians switched to 5.45 because weight, and recoil under full auto)

    April 23, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Nick

    “AK’s have failed”…that’s like saying “Shit has smelled good before.” Maybe. But rarely. Stoppages are a way of life for AR’s, an occasional thing for AK’s. Is the bullet going twice as fast? Let’s face it, I have some 154 grain soft nosed bullets. Probably travelling at least 4/5ths the speed of your 77 grainer. Twice the weight. Half again as large in diameter. Ain’t gonna throw mine in the mud. I have used both. Clean ’em, lube ’em, put ’em side by side and fire till they stop. See which one fails first. You know as well as I do the AK will still be running long after the AR freezes up. Heavier bullet, larger diameter, way more dependable. You know that.

    April 8, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Gruber

    the M16/AR15 was not the same weapon in 1967 as it is today. Everyone knows it had reliability issues, most of which was caused by ammunition/powder.

    January 20, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Hans

    SEALs *used* AKs in a war 50+ years ago, that’s not the same thing as “SEALs use them.” There’s a plethora of reasons they used them, not all were because of reliability. For example, if behind enemy lines, ammo can be resupplied off of enemy dead. Modern day SOF use a lot of different weapons, and train on everything they might encounter. It doesn’t mean the AK is their primary weapon, which is what you made it sound like.

    January 20, 2021
    Verified Review
  • Avatar

    Owen

    This is my first revolver and I am happy with it! It has a good feel, solid build, and easier to handle than I originally thought regarding the kick using 158g FMJ round. It also fits well with a pocket holster.

    January 5, 2020
    Verified Review

Leave feedback about this

Your email address will not be published.

error: Content is protected !!

Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop